Loading the post…
Specifying Certain Shaykhs as the Only References for Disputes and Correction of Affairs Is a Form of Hizbiyyah
abuiyaad.com (opens in a new tab)(English)
12. The ‘Return to the Scholars’ Issue: Regarding Calls to Refer Affairs Primarily to Shaykh ʿAbdullāh al-Bukhārī and ʿArafāt al-Muḥammadī
This section will detail the behavior and exaggeration (ghuluww) exhibited by individuals who use tazkiyāt, ambiguous statements or actual narrations to insist that the affairs of al-jarḥ wa al-taʿdīl, or other matters, be referred back only to Shaykh ʿAbdullāh al-Bukhārī and ʿArafāt al-Muḥammadī. It will also address the manhaj violations involved in such actions, based on the explanations of the major scholars.
A Common Misconception Amongst Students of Knowledge regarding the Principle “Return to the Scholars”, and the Response to Those Who Raise It in Matters of Clear Opposition to the Sunnah, from the Words of Shaykh Rabi‘ al-Madkhali, may Allah have mercy on him
Shaykh Rabi‘ al-Madkhali (رحمه الله) wrote in one of his refutations of Abul-Hasan al-Ma’ribi concerning the doubt: “Return to the scholars in every single matter”:
“Returning to the scholars is a great and very important matter in Islam however this happens in matters that are unclear to other than the scholars.
As for returning to them in clear matters, like the fundamentals Abul-Hasan opposed, then there is nothing upon the scholars except aiding and endorsing the truth and its people, and taking action against the oppressive wrongdoer who incites fitan.
Certainly, this call to seek judgment from the scholars in matters that are as clear as the sun is one of the heinous absurdities invented by this cunning al-‘Ar‘uri group (followers of ‘Adnan al-‘Ar‘ūr) and has deceived many from Ahl al-Sunnah.”
Source Article: ‘Bara’at Ahl al-Sunnah mimma nasabahu ilayhim dhul-fitnah.’ (Ahl al-Sunnah are innocent of the accusations made against them by the person of fitnah.)
Translation by: Markaz as-Sunnah
Resources
The Brixton Contract of Ḥizbiyyah
abuiyaad.com (opens in a new tab)(English)
Response to ʿAbd al-Ilāh al-Rifāʿī: Regarding Commendations of Scholars, the Speech of al-Maʾribī and Partisanship
abuiyaad.com (opens in a new tab)(English)
From a Restricted Nomination for Delivering Speeches… to Claiming a Pretended Religious Authority and a Whip of Accusations of Treachery: How the Fig Leaves Fell, Exposing the Deception of Fanatics in Employing the Words of the Eminent Scholar Ubaid al-Jabri – may Allah have mercy on him – as Revealed by the Article of Sheikh Bilāl ibn ʿAbd al-Ghanī al-Sālimī
Shaykh Fawaz bin Ali Al-Madkhali
Double Standards in ʿArafāt’s Discourse and That of His Gang: A Methodological Critique of Selective Practices that Harm the Daʿwah and Cause Confusion Among Salafi Youth, Including Contradictions in the Application of the Principle “Return to the Scholars”
Shaykh Fawwāz bin ʿAlī al-Madkhalī
Rejecting Exaggeration (Ghuluww) in Figureheads and Personalities
abuiyaad.com (opens in a new tab)(English)
The Response of al-ʿAllāmah ʿUbayd to the Lying Ṣalāḥ Kantoush
Shaykh Fawaz bin ’Ali al-Madkhali
Is Describing Shaykh Nizar as a Scholar a Cause of Division Among the Salafis?
Shaykh Abu Al-Abbas Bilāl ibn ʿAbd al-Ghanī al-Sālimī
When the Call to Return to the Scholars Is Abandoned: A Question of Double Standards
Shaykh Abū ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn Mūsā al-Tūnisī
On the Words of al-‘Allāmah Rabī‘
The Truth, Knowledge, and the Religion of Allah Do Not Die with the Death of Those Who Carry and Uphold Them
There Is No Fixed Point of Reference, No Sole Heir to the Scholars—the Religion of Allah Is in His Own Keeping.
Shaykh Nizār ibn Hāshim al-‘Abbās
Salafis Are Not Sufis… and Returning to the Truth Is More Comforting to Our Hearts
Shaykh ʿAbd al-Razzāq ibn Mūsā al-Jazāʾirī
I Do Not Love Cutting of Ties, Dr. Arafat Al-Muhammadi
Shaykh Ali Al-Hudhayfi Al-Adani
Pourquoi ‘Arafat a mis en garde contre le Cheikh ‘Alī ?
Dévoilement des tromperies
Conseils aux frères français
Dévoilement des tromperies